2005 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 360 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
| Model | Dingo | ATS |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1417 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2772 mm |
