2005 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1960 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 1,782 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Volvo P 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Volvo P 1800 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1960 Volvo P 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Volvo P 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi eK | 1960 Volvo P 1800 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | eK | P 1800 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2460 mm |