2005 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1747 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi eK | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
| Model | eK | Ram |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2537 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3560 mm |
