2005 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2012 BMW X5
To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X5 weights approximately 1650 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 2012 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi eK | 2012 BMW X5 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | BMW |
Model | eK | X5 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 400 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4854 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1933 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1775 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2933 mm |