2005 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 865 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi eK | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | eK | C-MAX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2649 mm |