2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 1254 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor (346 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Suzuki |
Model | Endeavor | Fronte |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 32 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 504 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 66 L |