2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1969 Opel GT
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Opel GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Opel GT would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1969 Opel GT. (101 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1969 Opel GT.
Because 1969 Opel GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Opel GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor (346 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Opel GT. (157 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Opel GT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1969 Opel GT | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Opel |
Model | Endeavor | GT |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 53 L |