2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1982 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Pontiac Firebird. (168 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1982 Pontiac Firebird.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Pontiac Firebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor (346 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Pontiac Firebird. (338 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Pontiac Firebird.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1982 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
Model | Endeavor | Firebird |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 4997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 338 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 60 L |