2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 2007 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2007 Nissan Armada is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (346 Nm). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 2007 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Endeavor | Armada |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 5552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 522 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 106 L |