2005 Mitsubishi Galant vs. 2012 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Galant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Galant would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Galant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (240 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Galant. (159 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Galant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 128 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Galant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Galant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (353 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Galant. (220 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Galant.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mitsubishi Galant 2012 Ford Falcon
Make Mitsubishi Ford
Model Galant Falcon
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2477 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 159 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 353 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.3:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1520 kg 1648 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2838 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 7.8 L/100km 6.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.2 L/100km 12.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.4 L/100km 8.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 67 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]