2005 Mitsubishi Galant vs. 2013 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Galant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Galant would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (380 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Galant. (159 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Galant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XK weights approximately 190 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Galant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Galant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (515 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Galant. (220 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Galant.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mitsubishi Galant 2013 Jaguar XK
Make Mitsubishi Jaguar
Model Galant XK
Year Released 2005 2013
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2477 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 159 HP 380 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 515 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 93 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1520 kg 1710 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4794 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 2032 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1322 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2752 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.8 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.2 L/100km 13.3 L/100km


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]