2005 Mitsubishi L 200 vs. 2010 BMW 323
To start off, 2010 BMW 323 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi L 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi L 200. (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi L 200.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 323. (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi L 200 | 2010 BMW 323 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | BMW |
Model | L 200 | 323 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2350 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2770 mm |