2005 Mitsubishi L 200 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi L 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 would be higher. At 2,350 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (113 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi L 200. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi L 200.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 (240 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (155 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi L 200 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | L 200 | Aveo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2350 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 113 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 155 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2525 mm |