2005 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1968 Reliant Regal
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Reliant Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Reliant Regal would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1968 Reliant Regal. (29 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1968 Reliant Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 835 kg more than 1968 Reliant Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Reliant Regal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Reliant Regal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (218 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Reliant Regal. (46 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Reliant Regal.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer | 1968 Reliant Regal | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Reliant |
| Model | Lancer | Regal |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2374 cc | 700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 29 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 46 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 61 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 455 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1940 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 27 L |
