2005 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1974 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 160 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight weights approximately 645 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1974 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight (380 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. (218 Nm). This means 1974 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer | 1974 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Lancer | Ninety-Eight |
Year Released | 2005 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2374 cc | 5736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 103.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 85.9 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3230 mm |