2005 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Lancer | Ranger |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |