2005 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 10 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mini |
Model | Lancer | Countryman |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4133 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 47 L |