2005 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1200 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Lancer | Phantom |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 6092 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3820 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 100 L |