2005 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1224 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Minica.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Minica | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Minica | XC60 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1934 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2748 mm |