2005 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1404 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Minica.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Minica | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
| Model | Minica | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 2114 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2154 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2916 mm |
