2005 Mitsubishi Nessie vs. 1962 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo P 1800 would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Volvo P 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | 1962 Volvo P 1800 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Nessie | P 1800 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2460 mm |
