2005 Mitsubishi Nessie vs. 1970 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 ZAZ 966 would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | 1970 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | ZAZ |
| Model | Nessie | 966 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2170 mm |
