2005 Mitsubishi Nessie vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie would be higher.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Land Rover |
| Model | Nessie | Range Rover Sport |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 375 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4783 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1933 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1788 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2743 mm |
