2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 425 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (217 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Outlander | Cedric |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 115 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |