2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1968 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1968 Toyota Corona. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 565 kg more than 1968 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (213 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Toyota Corona. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1968 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Outlander | Corona |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 115 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |