2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 160 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass (380 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Outlander | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2475 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 85.9 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2960 mm |
