2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (138 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 16 kg more than 1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass (230 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Outlander | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2376 cc | 3135 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1494 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2740 mm |
