2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 26 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Outlander | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2376 cc | 3135 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1536 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2740 mm |
