2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2002 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2002 Toyota Mark II. (157 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 45 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (213 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota Mark II. (200 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2002 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Outlander | Mark II |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |