2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 660 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Subaru |
Model | Outlander | R2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2343 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 63 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 30 L |