2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, both 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2005 Renault Clio were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 345 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (213 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Outlander | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 105 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 17.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |