2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2006 Renault Logan
To start off, 2006 Renault Logan is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2006 Renault Logan. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 405 kg more than 2006 Renault Logan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Logan. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Logan.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2006 Renault Logan | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Outlander | Logan |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2343 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |