2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2008 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 643 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 330 kg more than 2008 Koenigsegg CCX.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX (919 Nm) has 702 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (217 Nm). This means 2008 Koenigsegg CCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2008 Koenigsegg CCX | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Koenigsegg |
Model | Outlander | CCX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 806 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 919 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 18 L/100km |