2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2009 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 163 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Stavic weights approximately 413 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Stavic (342 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 2009 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2009 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Mitsubishi | SsangYong |
Model | Outlander | Stavic |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 342 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 80 L |