2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2010 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2010 Ford Maverick is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2010 Ford Maverick. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Maverick weights approximately 45 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Maverick. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2010 Ford Maverick | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Outlander | Maverick |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2343 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 62 L |