2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2010 Lancia Delta
To start off, 2010 Lancia Delta is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 163 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 80 kg more than 2010 Lancia Delta.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lancia Delta (360 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 2010 Lancia Delta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2010 Lancia Delta | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Lancia |
Model | Outlander | Delta |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 1956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 16.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 58 L |