2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge DURANGO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge DURANGO (355 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DURANGO should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DURANGO weights approximately 908 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge DURANGO (529 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge DURANGO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
| Model | Outlander | DURANGO |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2376 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 355 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5150 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 529 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2418 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2172 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1801 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3042 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 16.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 93 L |
