2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (222 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 31 kg more than 2013 Ford E-Series.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (387 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (217 Nm). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Outlander | E-Series |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 222 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 387 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.38:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 25 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1479 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 150 L |