2005 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.

Because 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mitsubishi Pajero 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
Make Mitsubishi Mitsubishi
Model Pajero Colt
Year Released 2005 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2972 cc 1244 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 175 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1840 kg 810 kg
Vehicle Length 4550 mm 3800 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2310 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]