2005 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2009 Pontiac G3
To start off, 2009 Pontiac G3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero (128 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2009 Pontiac G3. (105 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 2009 Pontiac G3.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Pontiac G3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero (190 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Pontiac G3. (142 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Pontiac G3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2009 Pontiac G3 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
Model | Pajero | G3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 45 L |