2005 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero. (128 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 646 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (361 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero. (190 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero. 2013 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Pajero | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 233 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 361 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.8 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1431 kg | 2077 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 5329 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1935 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3221 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 100 L |
