2005 Mitsubishi Space Star vs. 1994 Rover 400
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star (102 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1994 Rover 400. (88 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star weights approximately 110 kg more than 1994 Rover 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star (220 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 400. (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star | 1994 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
| Model | Space Star | 400 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2560 mm |
