2005 Morgan Aeromax vs. 1966 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2005 Morgan Aeromax is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Morgan Aeromax is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Morgan Aeromax (329 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Spitfire. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Morgan Aeromax should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Spitfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Morgan Aeromax (449 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph Spitfire. (93 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2005 Morgan Aeromax will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Morgan Aeromax | 1966 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Morgan | Triumph |
Model | Aeromax | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 329 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 449 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 37 L |