2005 Nissan 350Z vs. 1964 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2005 Nissan 350Z is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,726 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1964 TVR Griffith. (229 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1964 TVR Griffith. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 587 kg more than 1964 TVR Griffith. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan 350Z | 1964 TVR Griffith | |
| Make | Nissan | TVR |
| Model | 350Z | Griffith |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 287 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2170 mm |
