2005 Nissan 350Z vs. 1978 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Nissan 350Z is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1978 Volkswagen Polo. (49 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1978 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 784 kg more than 1978 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan 350Z (354 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volkswagen Polo. (77 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan 350Z | 1978 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
Model | 350Z | Polo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 354 Nm | 77 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1469 kg | 685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 35 L |