2005 Nissan 350Z vs. 1992 Volvo 480
To start off, 2005 Nissan 350Z is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 480. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 480 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 480, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan 350Z | 1992 Volvo 480 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | 350Z | 480 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2510 mm |