2005 Nissan 350Z vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Nissan 350Z is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan 350Z (300 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 14 kg more than 1998 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 75. (185 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan 350Z | 1998 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | 350Z | 75 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 66 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1464 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 66 L |
