2005 Nissan Almera vs. 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,269 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 108 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 738 kg more than 2005 Nissan Almera.
Because 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass (279 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Almera | 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
Model | Almera | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 4269 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 1815 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2850 mm |