2005 Nissan Almera vs. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Almera. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Almera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 73 kg more than 2005 Nissan Almera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Almera | 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
Model | Almera | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2260 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1112 kg | 1185 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |