2005 Nissan Almera vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,552 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (225 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Almera. (112 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Almera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 775 kg more than 2005 Nissan Almera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Nissan Almera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (375 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Almera. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Almera. 1994 Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan Almera has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan Almera will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Almera | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | Almera | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 4552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 112 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 375 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Top Speed | 173 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 2220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 100 L |
